alireza Sepehrara; s Talepasand; hamide Rahimpoor
Volume 2, Issue 6 , January 2012, , Pages 1-18
Abstract
Background: In many cases, teacher's teaching has been successful, but since it does not teach his/her students and his favorite surface is hard. The courses teacher teaches are also overwhelmed by the course books.
Objective: This objective of this study is to examine the alignment scores in evaluating ...
Read More
Background: In many cases, teacher's teaching has been successful, but since it does not teach his/her students and his favorite surface is hard. The courses teacher teaches are also overwhelmed by the course books.
Objective: This objective of this study is to examine the alignment scores in evaluating teachers in different subjects.
Methods: The study population was all of the courses which were evaluated in the first semester at Semnan University in the academic year of 1387-88. Thus, the first nine subjects from senior students using academic discipline, MC, level 5 (very difficult to very easy) resolution and a sample volume of 171 students was selected.
Results: Results showed that the use of a single score for the comparison of performance evaluation forms for teachers is a good way and comparing the scores for teacher evaluation scores must be obtained, are aligned. In this study, to justify the scores of the two methods into a park and z were used.
Conclusion: One of the reasons for non-alignment, differences in the type of student's evaluation of courses is the difficulty level courses.
